| CASE NUMBER | FIELD OF CASE | HEARING DATE | DEFENDING LAWYER | OPPOSING LAWYER | CASE VERDICT | NEXT HEARING DATE | FINAL HEARING DATE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9367895 | Civil case | 01-12-2019 | Sankarasubramanian A | Prathap Kumar M | This requirement for notice to be given to the landlord before there would be any obligation placed upon him/her to carry out repairs, was also clearly stated by Lord Hanworth MR in the case of Mogan V Liverpool cooperation | 23/2/2019 | 13/4/2019 |
| 1254695 | Criminal case | 02-07-2019 | Kesevanarayanan H | Pradeep M | Defendant was charged in Federal Court with Conspiracy by participating in a fraudulent scheme to defraud the Federal government by overcharging the Federal government for rocks placed during the construction of the North Jetty of the Barnegat Inlet. After a trial in Federal Court in Camden, NJ and upon motion made by Mr. Haines the defendant was granted a dismissal of all charges after the government finished its case in chief. The court found that the governments evidence was insufficient to require the defendant to put on a defense. | 15/3/2019 | 31/5/2019 |
| 5632498 | Family law case | 05-09-2019 | Udayakumar K | Murali K | Jim and Claire have been married for eight years and have two children under the age of six. Claire is a stay-at-home mom who has not worked for six years. Jim has a manufacturing job and earns $52,000 a year. Jim and Claire will share joint legal custody with residential custody awarded to Claire. Jim pays child support according to state guidelines which are based on the income shares method.There is a 60/40 division of marital assets in Claire’s favor and she is awarded short-term, rehabilitative spousal support for two years. | 06/7/2019 | 30/8/2019 |
| 2546985 | Adoption case | 14/5/2019 | Kanagaraj S | Rajesh S | A couple underwent divorce and it was mutually decided amongst them that the child will be maintained and taken care of the mother. She gave the child in adoption to the step father and a registration adoption was deed into . When the mother applied for the passport of the child , the passport said that as per a circular they couldnot enter the name of the step father and could only name biological father name . The mother filed a petition challenging this order | 06/7/2019 | 25/9/2019 |